Andrei Tarkovsky (1932-1986)
Source: Sight and Sound, Spring 1987, pp 108-109.
All rights are reserved
by Sight and Sound
and The British Film Institute (BFI). The article is
reproduced on Nostalghia.com with the kind permission of the Sight and
Sound Publishing Manager. We are also indebted to Andrew Utterson
and Nick Wrigley for tracking down the article for us.
With the shadow of his own fatal illness upon him, Tarkovsky, in his
final film The Sacrifice (1986), has Alexander speak the
words: "There is no death, only the fear of death." In the work he has
left us Tarkovsky will live on; of that there can be no doubt. But
with his going an epoch that began in 1962 with the showing of
Ivan's Childhood in Venice has come to an end.
Andrei Tarkovsky was born on 4 April 1932 in Savrashye on the Volga,
the son of Arseny Tarkovsky, a poet whose works met with considerable
acclaim in later years, and Maya Ivanovna Vishnyakova. Both parents
had studied at the Literary Institute in Moscow. The village where
their son was born no longer exists. It now lies beneath the waters
of a lake created when a dam was built in that area. But the places
and images of Tarkovsky's early ears left an indelible impression upon
him and were to have a profound influence on his work.
By 1935, when the family moved to a place outside Moscow, strains were
beginning to show in the relationship between mother and father,
leading to their divorce and the ultimate departure of the father.
Andrei grew up in the company of his mother, grandmother, and sister,
without a man in the house. In 1939 he attended a school in Moscow,
but was later evacuated to relatives on the Volga during the war.
With the outbreak of war his father volunteered for military service,
in the course of which he lost a leg. The family returned to Moscow
in 1943, where Tarkovsky's mother worked in a printing firm as a
reader and corrector. For the boy the war years were filled with two
main preoccupations: the question of survival and the return of his
father from the front. When Arseniy Tarkovsky did finally come back,
however, highly decorated with the Order of the Red Star, he did not
rejoin the family.
It was the firm wish of Tarkovky's mother that her son should work in
the field of art. Her own belief in the importance of art was
reflected in his formal education. Having attended a school of music
and later an art school, Tarkovky subsequently remarked that his work
as a director would have been inconceivable without this training.
From 1951 he studied at the Institute for Oriental Languages. These
studies were, however, broken off on account of a sports injury, and
Tarkovsky joined a geological research group on an expedition to
Siberia where he remained for nearly a year and produced a whole
series of drawings and sketches. In 1954, on his return from this
journey, he successfully applied for a place at the Moscow Film School
(VGIK), where he was to study under Mikhail Romm.
Tarkovsky's first feature film, and at the same time his diploma
submission at the school was The Steamroller and the Violin
(1960-1). The screenplay for this 46-minute film was the product of a
fruitful collaboration with Andrei Michalkov-Konchalovsky, with whom
Tarkovsky also worked on Andrei Roublev and
Michalkov-Konchalovsky's own film The First Teacher.
Tarkovsky's first "full-length" film, Ivan's Childhood
(1962), was, in contrast, the outcome of an extremely unpromising
situation. The project had started under the direction of E. Abalov,
but had been abandoned because of the unsatisfactory quality of the
sequences filmed. Later the decision was made to salvage the film
after all, and Tarkovsky was placed in charge of its completion. The
fact that he was able to create a work of such emotional impact in
these circumstances is testimony to his powers as a film-maker and his
strength of vision. Despite its mixed parentage, the film is very
much his child and bears the unmistakable fingerprints of his style.
It describes the fate of a young boy prematurely aged and ultimately
destroyed by the war. Tarkovsky denied the apparent parallels between
his own youth and that of Ivan, remarking that the only things they
had in common were their age and the circumstances of war. The film
won the Golden Lion at Venice and established Tarkovsky's
international reputation at a single stroke.
This was reinforced seven years later, when Andrei Roublev,
completed in 1966, was finally given its first showing in the west at
Cannes in 1969. Apart from the closing passages, the work was filmed
in black and white at Tarkovsky's insistence and depicts a vast
panorama of Russian medieval life and the experiences of the monk and
icon painter Roublev. The outward events, however, provide a canvas
for an apocalyptic view of the world that anticipates many themes in
Tarkovsky's final film.
Solaris (1972) was based on the novel of the same name by
Stanislav Lem. It is perhaps the least convincing of Tarkovsky's
films and indeed the one he himself found least satisfactory. Like
many of his works, it describes a journey (in this case a voyage to
the planet Solaris) that at the same time can be regarded as an inward
spiritual journey. Although the metaphysical dimension of the journey
and the phenomena it describes (the materialisation of visions and
memories) were themes that were evidently of great interest to
Tarkovsky, he was unable to escape entirely from the trappings of the
science fiction genre and penetrate to the human, psychological
problems that were closest to his heart. The film is nevertheless far
removed in this respect from Kubrick's 2001, A Space Odyssey
(1968), to which Solaris came to represent a kind of Russian
The Mirror (1974-75) was a film of quite a different quality,
with strongly autobiographical elements and of an intimate visionary
intensity. Allegedly, there is not a single invented episode in the
film. It is Tarkovsky's most personal work and was much criticised,
particularly in Russia, for its subjectivism; but its remarkable
portrayal of childhood, its magical, child's view of the world
provides us with a key to an understanding of the allusive technique
of Tarkovsky's entire oeuvre.
With Stalker (1979) he returned, outwardly at least, to the
world of science fiction. The film is based on the novel Roadside
Picnic by the brothers Arkadi and Boris Strugatsky and again
takes the form of a journey, this time into a forbidden "Zone." Here,
however, Tarkovsky makes the material completely his own, describing a
quest for belief through a landscape of industrial and spiritual ruin.
Here too he develops the techniques articulated in earlier films and
summarised in The Mirror, employing a wealth of iconographic
images and a colour code to distinguish between different realms and
states of consciousness.
His difficulties with the Soviet authorities led Tarkovsky to apply to
make his next film, Nostalghia (1983), in Italy. Ironically,
it describes the homesickness for Russia of a scientist who has come
to research in Italy and who ultimately dies before he can return. It
continues Tarkovsky's search for the roots of life and belief in
modern society and is filled with those allegories and visual icons,
shifts of time, person and place that one increasingly came to
associate with this director. The self-sacrifice that Domenico makes
in Nostalghia, in an attempt to find that point in our
history where we had taken the wrong turning, is taken up again in
Tarkovsky's last film.
Nostalghia was dedicated to his mother; The
Sacrifice (1986), shot when he was marked by illness, is
dedicated to Tarkovsky's son, and is a protestation of faith and hope
for the future. The film, generally regarded as the outstanding work
at Cannes in 1986 and expected to win the Golden Palm, was finally
awarded the Special Prize of the Jury, which because of his illness,
was collected on his behalf by his son.
Tarkovsky's reputation rests on a slender oeuvre of eight films made
over a period of little more than 25 years. His final project,
Hoffmaniana, based on a screenplay he first published in
1976, and dealing with the life and work of the German Romantic poet
E.T.A. Hoffmann, remained unfinished. But this handful of completed
works is individually of such weight and vision that each of them
alone might have secured him a place in film history. It was his
ambition to raise the art of cinema to a level achieved in the other
arts; in literature, for example, by poets such as Dostoevsky or
Childhood and war, the quest for belief, nostalgia as a yearning for
home, as a sickness unto death, sacrifice and hope are not merely the
epic and universal themes of his films; they are at the same time
stations in his own life. Rarely can there have been such congruence
between subject and object. The physical worlds in which his journeys
in film take place are the interior realms of his spiritual quest
A successor to his own Roublev, a commentator on our modern condition,
an icon painter in film, and a man of profound belief, it was
Tarkovsky's aim to bring the inward spiritual world into a state of
harmony with the outward, material world. Perhaps more than any
other, he perceived the potential of film for charting the modern
space-time dimension we inhabit.
Andrei Tarkovsky died of lung cancer in Paris on the night of
28/29 December 1986. His life's work is the tree he himself planted
and that, if we tend it well, may be wakened to life in the future.
In the end, it was as if he had been overtaken by his own images,
by the white horse recurring in his films, and by his own preoccupations
with the Apocalypse and the vision of St. John: "And I looked,
and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death."