Should I buy the PAL or the NTSC version?
Many thanks to Andrey Diment for contributing significantly this article.
The large Kino and RusCiCo framegrab series below were originally prepared
by Andrey Diment for the DVDBeaver ListServ.
Thanks also to Ted Todorov for helpful advice.
Take, for example, the Russican Cinema Council's DVD editions of Stalker and Mirror.
They are available in NTSC versions (e.g., directly from RusCiCo or, in the case of Stalker,
through Image Entertainment in the USA)
and PAL versions (e.g., from Artificial Eye in the UK). The PAL version suffers, of
course, from "PAL speedup" — the inevitable penalty associated with transferring
24 frames-per-second (fps) film to 25 fps video. The film thus runs 4% too fast, with
a correspondingly shorter total runtime. But so does the NTSC version, indicating that
the NTSC version has (regrettably) been produced based on a PAL video source, preserving the unfortunate
PAL speedup straight through to the NTSC stage (PAL masters can be inexpensively
made in Moscow, proper NTSC masters would have to be made abroad at a fairly high price... which would
cut into profit margins). Both DVD versions of the film thus have the same
runtime and they both run 4% too fast. So, does it at all matter which version you decide to spend your hard-earned money on?
The answer, as will be demonstrated below, is "yes, it does matter." For the purposes of this article,
we assume that you live in NTSC-land and that you have the capablity to play both PAL and NTSC DVDs, a capability
that can now be purchased for a price less than two Criterion DVDs.
Look at the following two still frames from Stalker (showing the famous AT monogram), as displayed
on an interlaced NTSC monitor.
On the left we have a still frame taken from the PAL disc (Artificial Eye) with PAL-to-NTSC conversion
performed by a cheap DVD player (Malata) capable of making such a conversion on-the-fly
(presumably by simply repeating every Nth frame).
On the right we have the same frame taken from the NTSC version of the DVD (Image Entertainment),
wherein PAL-to-NTSC conversion has of course already been done for us, by RusCiCo themselves.
|PAL to NTSC conversion done by home DVD player.
(PAL RusCiCo DVD, Artificial Eye)
|PAL to NTSC conversion done by RusCiCo.
(NTSC RusCiCo DVD, Image Entertainment)
Watching on a standard interlaced TV-set, one cannot see any noticeable difference between the two
while the DVDs are playing, but in still frame mode it becomes
evident that the RusCiCo conversion is done by
periodically inserting frame interpolation ("double
exposures") of varying proportions. The frame grab shown on
the right catches both overlapping images at some appropriately weighed relative intensity.
This is normally considered desirable, as during playback
it makes the motion more fluid, but it does ruin still frames
by creating the characteristic "ghosting" effect seen in
the still on the right (click to enlarge). As mentioned, one cannot see any difference while
in "play" mode, so there does not seem to be any
obvious advantage to the RusCiCo "high-tech" conversion.
But are there any identifiable disadvantages to this
type of conversion? The answer is yes.
First, let us point out that the conversion method used by
RusCiCo is not unique in any way. It is a highly common
algorithm (similar in nature to a telecine process), one that is used by most major distributors,
such as Kino and FoxLorber/Wellspring.
The below side-by-side comparison, prepared for us by Andrey Diment, of a RusCiCo NTSC DVD title (Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears)
and a Kino NTSC DVD title (Conspirators of Pleasure) shows
that the pattern used is the same in both cases.
The fields (odd and even) of each interlaced video frame are here presented
separately (one on top of the other), to better help us see what is going on.
Click on a frame capture to view it in full resolution, click a second
time to revert back to the small size (click on the numerals near the
|Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears (RusCiCo, NTSC)
|Conspirators of Pleasure (Kino, NTSC)
Note that the first and last frame of each sequence are "clean." The other
frames contain fields that are blended with neighbouring fields.
We would like to point out two major problems with this process:
Some parts of the original picture are lost for good. Take a look
at Frame #2 in the sequences above: the bottom field is clean, but the top field is blended.
Moreover, the subsequent frame has its top field blended as well, which
means you will never be able to recover the image as it was originally caught on film.
You will forever see it half-smeared, ie., image sharpness has been permanently sacrificed.
The same goes for Frame #5 (top) and #6 (top) in the sequence.
- While film-sourced DVDs would (ideally) store 24 full frames per second, converting
them into 30 fps during playback, in this case we have all 30 images stored
on the DVD, with artificially blended fields encoded during the mastering process itself.
1 second of PAL-sourced NTSC has 25 PAL frames — not always the original frames, as we have seen! —
plus 5 additional frames (10 blended fields, in various places), with a resulting overhead of 5/30 = 16.7%. In
both cases, the overhead is useless information permanently stored on the DVD, leaving less available
bandwidth for the movie itself.
Thus, when you look at the Solaris review and see
that both PAL and NTSC DVDs have equal bitrates, you may very well
ask yourself: "If the bitrates are equal, and approximately 17% of the information stored on
the NTSC DVD is garbage, who is the real winner?"
As already mentioned, there may very well be no discernible difference between the two
types of conversion while watching the material in play mode on a standard TV-set.
But watching the DVDs on a computer monitor, or on one of the increasingly popular
progressive scan devices, is quite another story. For instance, sequences in which the camera pans
quickly tend to look awful on such displays when watching PAL-sourced NTSC encoded discs.
Nostalghia.com recommends that, whenever possible, PAL-sourced NTSC versions be avoided.
Whenever an NTSC DVD suffers from PAL speedup, it's a sure sign that one should try to obtain the PAL version. People in NTSC-land can view these on
a multi-system monitor/TV/projector or else get an inexpensive (less than $100) DVD player
with built-in on-the-fly PAL-to-NTSC conversion.